Introduction
When it comes to industrial automation, choosing the right system can make or break your operations. ABB and Allen Bradley are two giants in this space, but which one is the best fit for your needs?
In this article, we will compare the key differences between ABB and Allen Bradley. You will learn how their unique features, cost structures, and performance levels impact industrial applications, helping you make an informed choice.
Market Position and Strategy: Allen Bradley vs ABB
Allen Bradley’s Dominance in North American Manufacturing
Allen Bradley, a part of Rockwell Automation, holds a significant share of the industrial automation market in North America. It excels in discrete manufacturing applications, particularly in industries like automotive, food & beverage, and packaging. The brand's "Integrated Architecture" approach ensures seamless integration across all its products, which greatly reduces engineering time and simplifies the control system setup. By maintaining a strong ecosystem that includes PLCs, drives, and HMIs, Allen Bradley offers a reliable and efficient solution that is easy to support but often comes with a premium cost.
ABB’s Global Strength in Process Industries and Power Generation
In contrast, ABB is recognized for its global footprint and versatility, particularly in heavy industries like power generation, marine, and energy. ABB’s control systems are designed with a more open architecture, making them compatible with various protocols and other systems. This flexibility is especially beneficial for industries that require robust and adaptable solutions, such as power plants, water treatment facilities, and robotics. ABB’s focus on modularity allows businesses to scale their automation systems more easily while adapting to changing needs in complex environments.
![ABB]( "ABB")
Key Market Differences and Their Implications for Industrial Applications
Allen Bradley’s approach revolves around a more integrated, user-friendly system that is designed to stay within the Rockwell Automation ecosystem. This strategy leads to fewer compatibility issues but may require higher initial costs. On the other hand, ABB offers a more flexible, open-platform system that can integrate with various systems, making it ideal for global applications where different protocols and equipment need to work together.
Hardware and Performance Comparison: Allen Bradley ControlLogix vs ABB AC500 PLCs
Allen Bradley’s ControlLogix: Speed and Seamless Integration for High-Speed Applications
Allen Bradley’s ControlLogix series stands out in high-speed motion control applications. Its PLCs are particularly well-suited for industries like packaging, where every millisecond counts. The seamless integration of various components—such as drives, HMIs, and safety systems—ensures that the system operates smoothly and efficiently. ControlLogix PLCs are robust, reliable, and specifically designed to handle time-sensitive tasks with precision.
ABB AC500: Modular, Rugged, and Ideal for Harsh Environments
ABB’s AC500 series excels in modularity and is built for extreme environments. These PLCs are perfect for applications in offshore oil rigs, wind turbines, and other harsh conditions where reliability and ruggedness are critical. With features like vibration resistance and temperature tolerance, the AC500 is designed to endure extreme conditions while maintaining high performance. Its modularity allows it to adapt to a variety of setups, making it a versatile choice for complex systems.
Feature | Allen Bradley ControlLogix | ABB AC500 |
Best for | High-speed motion control applications | Harsh environments (offshore oil rigs, wind turbines, etc.) |
Key Strength | Speed and seamless integration of drives, HMIs, and safety systems | Rugged design with modularity for flexibility |
Environmental Suitability | Ideal for factory settings with high-speed requirements | Designed to withstand extreme conditions (vibration, temperature) |
Performance Focus | Precision, reliability, and seamless operation in time-sensitive tasks | Robust performance in challenging environments |
Modularity | Limited modularity, focused on integration | High modularity, adaptable to various setups |
Application Examples | Packaging, automotive, food & beverage industries | Offshore oil rigs, wind turbines, industrial sites with extreme conditions |
When to Choose Allen Bradley or ABB Based on Hardware Requirements
Choosing between Allen Bradley and ABB for your hardware needs largely depends on the environmental conditions and application scale. If you need high-speed motion control and are working in a factory setting, Allen Bradley is the best option. However, if you need a system that can withstand extreme conditions and offers flexibility, ABB’s AC500 series would be the better choice.
Software Ecosystems: Studio 5000 vs ABB Automation Builder
Rockwell’s Studio 5000: User-Friendly and Efficient for Quick Troubleshooting
Allen Bradley’s Studio 5000 is a highly intuitive software suite that is known for its ease of use. The graphical interface is user-friendly, making it easy for operators to troubleshoot and resolve issues without requiring extensive training. This is one of the reasons why Allen Bradley PLCs are so widely used in North America. The software is also designed to work seamlessly with the hardware, making setup and maintenance relatively straightforward.
ABB’s Automation Builder: Advanced Capabilities with a Steeper Learning Curve
ABB’s Automation Builder, based on CoDeSys, offers a more advanced and flexible approach but comes with a steeper learning curve. The software suite is incredibly powerful and allows for complex system integrations, but it may take more time and training for operators to become proficient. However, ABB’s approach is ideal for users who need to integrate robotics and other advanced technologies, as the software allows for offline programming and simulation with tools like RobotStudio.
Impact on System Maintenance: Comparing Ease of Use vs Technical Depth
While Allen Bradley’s Studio 5000 offers simplicity and ease of use, ABB’s Automation Builder provides greater technical depth and flexibility. The choice between the two depends on the complexity of the application and the skill level of your team. If you prioritize ease of maintenance and quick troubleshooting, Allen Bradley is the way to go. However, if your systems require advanced programming and integration, ABB’s robust capabilities will serve you better in the long run.
Price Comparison: The "Rockwell Tax" vs ABB’s Cost Efficiency
Allen Bradley’s Premium Cost for Reliability and Ecosystem Integration
Allen Bradley is often perceived as the more expensive option, with higher upfront costs and recurring support fees. However, this "Rockwell Tax" is often justified by the brand’s reputation for reliability, ease of use, and seamless integration within the Rockwell ecosystem. The strong local support network and extensive training resources also contribute to its higher price point.
ABB’s Cost-Effective, Flexible Solutions for a Broader Range of Applications
ABB’s pricing is generally more competitive, especially in international markets. While the initial setup may involve more engineering costs, ABB’s modularity and flexible approach allow businesses to build more customized and cost-efficient solutions. The overall cost of ownership can be lower due to lower licensing fees and fewer ongoing expenses compared to Allen Bradley.
How to Balance Cost vs. Value: Making the Right Investment
When choosing between Allen Bradley and ABB, it's important to weigh the upfront costs against the long-term value. Allen Bradley offers peace of mind with its reliable ecosystem and local support, but at a premium. ABB offers a more flexible, lower-cost alternative, but requires more technical expertise for setup and maintenance.
Price Dimension | Allen Bradley PLC | ABB AC500 PLC |
Entry-Level PLC | CompactLogix / Micro800 basic system: approx. $1,000–$5,000 (¥7,000–¥36,000) | AC500-eCo basic CPU: approx. $550–$1,300 (¥4,000–¥9,400) |
Mid-Level PLC | ControlLogix mid-range CPU: approx. $5,000–$10,000+ (¥36,000–¥72,000) | AC500 standard mid-range CPU: approx. $1,400–$3,200 (¥10,000–¥23,000) |
High-End PLC | High-end/redundant ControlLogix systems: could be > $20,000 (¥144,000+) | AC500 high-performance CPU: approx. $3,500–$8,500 (¥25,000–¥61,000) |
Ultra-High-Performance Modules | Specialized models (e.g., GuardLogix safety controller) can > $8,000 (¥58,000) | AC500 PM595 high-end CPU: approx. £5,969.95 (~$7,400/¥53,000) |
Overall System Range | Overall system costs tend to be significantly higher due to ecosystem support services | ABB systems are more flexible, allowing businesses to build cost-efficient solutions based on modules |
Market Positioning Cost | Typically the highest total cost (including software, support, etc.) | More cost-efficient and budget-friendly with flexibility |
Connectivity and Protocols: EtherNet/IP vs Open Standards
Allen Bradley’s Reliance on EtherNet/IP for Integrated Ecosystems
Allen Bradley’s use of EtherNet/IP as its primary communication protocol ensures fast and reliable connectivity within the Rockwell ecosystem. This is particularly useful for industries that require high-speed data transfer and seamless integration across various devices. However, integrating Allen Bradley PLCs with non-Rockwell systems may require additional hardware or third-party gateways.
ABB’s Multi-Protocol Flexibility: Supporting Profinet, Modbus, EtherCAT, and More
ABB offers superior flexibility with support for multiple protocols like Profinet, Modbus, and EtherCAT, making it a more versatile choice for facilities that have equipment from various manufacturers. This multi-protocol support ensures smooth communication across a diverse range of devices, which is particularly beneficial for retrofitting older systems or working in mixed-brand environments.
![ABB]( "ABB")
Protocol Compatibility: Choosing the Best Option for Legacy and Future Systems
The choice between Allen Bradley and ABB’s protocols depends on your existing infrastructure and future needs. If your systems are already integrated into the Rockwell ecosystem, Allen Bradley’s EtherNet/IP is the natural choice. However, if you’re working in an environment with mixed brands or legacy equipment, ABB’s support for multiple protocols will ensure greater compatibility and future-proofing.
Best Use Cases for Allen Bradley and ABB
Applications Best Suited for Allen Bradley PLCs
Allen Bradley PLCs are ideal for high-speed applications in discrete manufacturing sectors such as automotive, food & beverage, and packaging. Their ease of use and seamless integration with Rockwell’s ecosystem make them the go-to solution for factories looking for reliability and quick troubleshooting.
ABB’s Strengths in Power Generation, Marine, and Robotics
ABB is best suited for industries that require flexibility and robustness, such as power generation, water treatment, marine industries, and robotics. Their open architecture and modular systems allow for highly customizable solutions that can adapt to a wide range of environments.
Hybrid Approaches: Combining Allen Bradley and ABB for Complex Facilities
In some large facilities, a hybrid approach may be the best solution. Allen Bradley can be used for high-speed applications on the production floor, while ABB’s systems manage energy management, robotics, and process control. This combination ensures that the facility can leverage the strengths of both systems for optimal efficiency.
Conclusion
This article compares the core differences between Allen Bradley and ABB. Allen Bradley offers integrated, high-speed systems ideal for industries like automotive and packaging. On the other hand, ABB provides flexible, cost-effective solutions suitable for power generation and marine applications. The best choice depends on your industry needs, infrastructure, and budget. Some industries may benefit from using both systems in a hybrid approach, leveraging the strengths of each.
At Joyoung International Trading Co., Ltd., we provide tailored solutions. Our experts can help you make the best decision based on your needs.
FAQ
Q: What are the key differences between Allen Bradley and ABB PLCs?
A: Allen Bradley is known for its integrated, high-speed systems, while ABB offers more flexible, modular solutions that excel in power generation and robotics.
Q: How do I choose between Allen Bradley and ABB for my industrial application?
A: Choose Allen Bradley for high-speed, seamless integration in discrete manufacturing. Opt for ABB if you need a flexible, cost-effective solution for complex, global applications.
Q: Why is Allen Bradley more expensive than ABB?
A: Allen Bradley typically carries a higher price due to its premium ecosystem, strong local support, and reliable integration, whereas ABB offers more affordable and customizable solutions.
Q: Can Allen Bradley and ABB be used together in the same system?
A: Yes, both brands can be integrated in hybrid systems. For example, Allen Bradley can handle high-speed applications, while ABB can manage energy and robotics functions.
Q: Which PLC is better for industries with extreme conditions, Allen Bradley or ABB?
A: ABB is better suited for extreme environments, offering rugged PLCs like the AC500 series, which are designed for harsh conditions such as offshore oil rigs and wind turbines.
